1-(202) 684-6756

Expert Witness : Richard Katzman MD


Case Gary Grable v. Ashis Rakhit, MD
Testimony Date September 12, 2000
Expert Type Internal Medicine
Court State: Ohio County: Cuyahoga
Pages 55
Cost $150.00

OR

Trade us a transcript with expert testimony for this transcript

Click Here For Details

.1
	1	IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
	2	. CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO
	3		GARY GRABEL,
	4	Plaintiff,
			JUDGE GAUL
	5	-vs-	CASE NO. 383110
	6	.	ASHIS RAKHIT, M.D., et al.,
	7		              Defendants.
	8
	9		     ~osiflon5C}ThTRcK '~KATZMANThCb
	10		taken as if upon direct examination before Judith
	11		A. Gage, a Registered Merit Reporter and Notary
	12,		~ub1ic within and for the State of Ohio, at the
	13		offices of Weston, Hurd, Fallon, Paisley &
	14		Howley, 2500 Terminal Tower, Cleveland, Ohio, at
	15		4:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 12, 2000,
	16		pursuant to notice and/or stipulations of
	17		counsel, on behalf of the Defendant in this
	18		cause.

19
	20	MEHLER & HAGESTROM
		 Court Reporters
21
		     CLEVELAND	      AKRON
	22	1750 Midland Building	1015 Key Building
		Cleveland, Ohio 44115	Akron, Ohio 44308
	23	    216.621.4984	   330.535.7300
		    FAX 621.0050	   FAX 535.0050
	24	    800.822.0650	   800.562.7100

25

.2


APPEARANCES:
	2	Robert V. Traci, Esq.
		Traci & Marx
	3	1550 Illuminating Building
		Cleveland, Ohio 44113
	4	(216) 623-8010,
	5	On behalf of the Plaintiff;

6
		Ronald Rispo, Esq.
	7	Weston, Hurd, Fallon, Paisley & Rowley
		2500 Terminal Tower
	8	Cleveland, Ohio 44113
		(216) 241-6602,
	9
		    On behalf of the Defendant.
10

11

12


13


14

15


16

17

18


19


20


21

22


23


24

25

3


	RICHARD K: KATZMAN, M.D., of lawful age,
called by the Defendant for the purpose ~f direct
examination, as provided by the Rules of Civil
Procedure, being by me first duly sworn, as
hereinafter certified, deposed and said as
follows:

DIRECT EXAMINATION OF RICHARD K. KATZMAN, M.D.

BY MR. RISPO

Q.	Dr. Katzman, thank you for coming down this
afternoon.

For the record, I would like to introduce
myself.
	I am representing Dr. Ashis Rakhit, who
is a defendant in this matter, and I have a
number of questions to ask of you concerning your
consultations, which I think is the best way of
describing your inVolvement in this case.

If at any time during the course of the

proceedings the question is not clear, please do
not answer, have me repeat it, rephrase it, or
have it read back.
Are we in agreement on that?
Q.	For the record, doctor, would you state your full



A.	Richard K. Katzman, M.D.
1

2

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

:i.i

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

2