1-(202) 684-6756

Expert Witness : Dominic Davolos MD


Case SHARI ELDOT V. UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF CLEVELAND
Testimony Date January 17, 1986
Expert Type Cardiology
Court Federal District Court, Northern District of Ohio
Pages 145
Cost $150.00

OR

Trade us a transcript with expert testimony for this transcript

Click Here For Details

                                                            @-33


                    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                         NORTHERN DISTRICT OF 01110
                             EASTERN DIVISION





           SHARI ELDOT,

                       Plaintiff,
                                       Case No. C?4 3196
                VS.
                                       Judge Alice Batchelder
           UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF
           CLEVELAND, INC., et al.,

                       Defendants.


                Transcript of the deposition of Dr-DominiC DavoloS
           called as a witness by the Defendants, taken be4ore me,
           Margaret M. Arvay, a Registered Professional Reporter
           and Notary Public within and for the State of Ohio,
           pursuant to notice of counsel at the offices of
           Reminger and Reminger Co. L.P.A., 300 Leader
           Building, Cleveland, Ohio on Friday, the 17tti day
           of January, 1936 commencing at 2:00 o'clock p.m.
                          I N D E X

                                       DIRECT  CROSS  REDIRECT  RECROS.,

          Marc Groedel                     3             136

         Richard Giffels                        89               141

         Michael Zellers                        113              143

         John Kluznik                           135

                                       MR. GROEDEL:         Let the record        3
                            show that we are here for the discovery
                            deposition of Dr. Do-iinic Davolos, one
                            of the Plainti-If's experts in this case
                            and the deposition is being taken Pursu-
                            ant to agreement of the parties and it
                            is being taken for discovery purposes
                            only, and I would assume that any defects
                            in service and notice are waived todav.
                                       MR. BOURNE:          That's correct.
                            I would also like the record to reflect
                            that I am here on behalf of Attorney
                            willia-,i Bonezzi who has a conflict and
                            is reserving anv rights to cross-examina-
                            tion in this matter.