![]()
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2 COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
3 CUYAHOGA COUNTYL OHIO
4 EMIL DECREDICO, etc.,
5 Plaintiff,
6 VS. CASE NO. 112643
7 HURON ROAD HOSPITAL, et al.?
8 Defendants.
VOLUME II
9
10 DEPOSITIOR OF J. JUDSON McNAMARA, M.D.
11 Taken on Behalf of the Defendantp on Thursday, March 24i
12 1988, commencing at 2:00 p.m., at the Medical Offices of
13 Doctor J. Judson MCNamara, 1301 Punchbowl St., Honolulur
14 Hawaii* pursuant to Notice.
15
For the Plaintiff: HOWARD D. MISHKIND, ESQ.
16 Weismanp Goldberg & Weisman
540 Leader Building
17 Cleveland, Ohio 44114
18 For the Defendants ANTHONY P. DAPORE, ESQ.
Huron Road Radiologists, Jacobson, Maynard,
19 Doctors Bernard# Archert Tuschman & Kalur
Waffle; and Emergency 14th Fl., 100 Erieview Plaza
20 Care Specialists: Clevelandp Ohio 44114
21 For the Defendant, PETER W. MARMAROS, ESO.
Huron Road Hospital: Reminger & Reminger
22 13th Street Clair Bldg.
Clevelandl Ohio 44114
23
24 BEFORE: Barbara Fenton Moore, C.S.R. #163
Notary Public, State of Hawaii
25
CARNAZZO COURT-REPORTING CO.
1-A
I N D E X
2 Page
3 EXA14INATION BY:
4 Mr. Dapore (Continued) 2
5 Mr. Marmaros 33@
6 FURTHER EXAMINATION BY:
7 Mr. Dapore 51
8 Mr. Marmaros 55
9 EXHIBITS FOR IDENTIFICATION:
10 Defendant's Exhibit D 33
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
LAWYER'S NOTES
Page Lim]
I aGi @@ @ -% I
k v
.2,1 - - A@ cify
t -@ 1) \i
Lf CO.O@ A @ I -T @ -
I I
- v @
,P@
I
i
I
i i
I i
2
1 EXAMINATION BY MR. DAPORE (continued)
2 MR. DAPORE: On the record.
3 Q (By MR. DAPORE) Doctor McNamara, we are now resuming
4 your deposition after your being called away for emergency
5 surgery yesterday.
6 Where we left off yesterdaye we had taken a look at
7 Defendant's Exhibit B and you had marked on that Exhibit the
8 area which you describe in your report as being where the
9 aneurysm was primarily locatedf and you also then marked on
10 the Exhibit where the aneurysm was as described by the
11 autopsy report.
12 I would like to pick it up from there and continue on.
13 How would you characterize the lesion as described in
14 the autopsy in comparison to your description in your report;
15 as more or less extensive?
16 A As I indicatede the autopsy report is vague in terms of
17 its anatomic description. It describes an area which ist in
18 factp just an enlargement, from the aortic valve cusp to the
19 junction of the upper descending aorta.
20 I don't
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright 2004 - 2008 CrossExam LLC All rights reserved.dmca | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||