Home

Find Transcripts
Search Transcripts
Browse by Case Name
Browse by Expert Name
Browse by Expert Type
Product Pricing
Legal Topics
FAQ

Demo

REGISTER!

About Us
HELP!
Links
Privacy Policy

 


Get a FREE copy of this Transcript!
By clicking the "BUY NOW" button, you agree to our Transcript License Agreement
Cost: $150.00
Case: Baez v. Temple University Hospital, et al
Testimony Date: August 19, 2002
Expert Witness: Mary Edwards-Brown MD
Expert Type: Radiology / Nuclear Medicine
Court: State: Pennsylvania County: Philadelphia
Pages: 201
	 
                                                                             1




         1

         2                      IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

         3                FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

         4                          CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION

         5                                -  -  -

         6        ANGELY MARIE BAEZ, A MINOR,: NOVEMBER TERM, 1999
                  BY AND THROUGH HER NATURAL :
         7        PARENT AND GUARDIAN, MARIA :
                  BARBER, IN HER OWN RIGHT   :
         8                                   :
                         VS.                 :
         9                                   :
                  TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL,:
        10        DRS. ANDREW ROSEN, VALERIE :
                  WHITEMAN, KIM PHONG DANG,  :
        11        MOHAMMED EL-MALLAH, BERNICE:
                  DUESLER, JOAN TAULANE      : NO. 0903
        12
                                          -  -  -
        13
                                       AUGUST 19, 2002
        14
                                          -  -  -
        15
                                  COURTROOM 243, CITY HALL
        16                       PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA

        17                                -  -  -

        18        BEFORE:  HONORABLE ALLAN L. TERESHKO, J.
                                         AND A JURY
        19

        20

        21

        22

        23                     GEORGE D'ANGELIS, R.P.R.
                               COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
        24                     OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
 
                                                                             2




         1

         2

         3

         4        APPEARANCES:

         5

         6                     JOSEPH ARMENTI & ASSOCIATES
                               BY:  JOSEPH R. ARMENTI, ESQUIRE
         7                     COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFFS

         8

         9
                               MYLOTTE, DAVID & FITZPATRICK
        10                     BY:  CHARLES A. FITZPATRICK, III, ESQUIRE
                                    MICHAEL G. SABO, ESQUIRE
        11                     COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANTS

        12

        13

        14

        15

        16

        17

        18

        19

        20

        21

        22

        23

        24
 
                                                                             3




         1

         2                                 I_N_D_E_X
                                           _ _ _ _ _

         3        OPENING BY MR. ARMENTI - PAGE 13

         4        OPENING BY MR. FITZPATRICK - PAGE 29
                  WITNESSES
                  _________
         5                                   DIRECT  CROSS  REDIRECT  RECROSS

         6        MARY K. EDWARDS-BROWN,M.D.  56      119     124     129

         7        MOHAMMAD EL-MALLAH, M.D.            131     191     196
                                                              199
         8

         9

        10

        11

        12

        13

        14

        15

        16

        17

        18

        19

        20

        21

        22

        23

        24
 
                                                                             4




         1

         2                         MORNING_SESSION
                                   _______ _______

         3

         4

         5                     (WHEREUPON COUNSEL MET WITH THE COURT

         6               IN CHAMBERS:)

         7                           THE COURT:  YOU CALLED ON

         8               FRIDAY.  WE WERE OUT FRIDAY.  YOU RAISED AN

         9               ISSUE ABOUT ONE OF YOUR MOTIONS.  A

        10               CONFLICT.  ONE OF THE MOTIONS IS --

        11                           MR. ARMENTI:  THERE WAS A COURT

        12               ORDER.

        13                           THE COURT:  DO WE NEED TO

        14               ADDRESS IT NOW?

        15                           MR. ARMENTI:  WE CAN ADDRESS IT

        16               THEN, BUT IT WOULD HELP JUST TO KNOW.

        17                           THE COURT:  DO YOU REMEMBER THE

        18               ISSUE GENERALLY?

        19                           MR. ARMENTI:  THE ISSUE

        20               GENERALLY WAS THE COURT ORDER HAD TWO

        21               DIFFERENT WAYS.  FIRST OF ALL, IT SAID THAT

        22               MANNING WAS COMPLETELY EXCLUDED.

        23               UNDERNEATH THAT IT HAD X, Y AND Z WAS

        24               EXCLUDED.  IN FACT --
 
                                                                             5




         1     
	 

 


      Copyright 2004 - 2008 CrossExam LLC
      All rights reserved.
dmca