Home

Find Transcripts
Search Transcripts
Browse by Case Name
Browse by Expert Name
Browse by Expert Type
Product Pricing
Legal Topics
FAQ

Demo

REGISTER!

About Us
HELP!
Links
Privacy Policy

 


By clicking the "BUY NOW" button, you agree to our Transcript License Agreement
Cost: $528.00
Case: Giannoe v. Chung, M.D., et al
Testimony Date: January 09, 2001
Expert Witness: Eric Fine M.D.
Expert Type: Psychiatry
Court: State: Pennsylvania County: Philadelphia
Pages: 176

	 




                    IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY

                          FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

                                    CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION

                                           - - -

                  FRANCES GIANNONE                :  JUNE TERM, 1998

                      VS.

                  CHRISTINE CHUNG, M.D. AND       :  NO. 2778
                  KETAN KIRALAL PATEL, M.D.
                  AND WILLS EYE HOSPITAL

                                           - - -

                                  COURTROOM 253, CITY HALL
                                 PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA

                                           - - -

                                      JANUARY 9, 2001

                                         VOLUME II

                                           - - -

                           BEFORE:  HONORABLE VICTOR J. DI NUBILE

                                           - - -




                       GEORGE D'ANGELIS, RPR, OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
                                    LAND TITLE BUILDING
                                    100 S. BROAD STREET
                                        SECOND FLOOR
                             PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, 19110
                                       (215) 683-8056


                                           - - -
 







                  APPEARANCES:



                               LAW FIRM:  BEASLEY, CASEY AND ERBSTEIN
                               BY: JAMES E. FOERSTNER, ESQUIRE
                               COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFF



                               LAW FIRM: POST AND SCHELL, P.C.
                               BY:  WILLIAM F. SUTTON, ESQUIRE
                               COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANTS
 







                                           INDEX
                                           _____



                  WITNESSES:
                  _________ 

                                 DIRECT     CROSS     REDIRECT     RECROSS

                  ERIC W. FINE     18          26       115          124
                                   28          71

                  HERBERT FINGLES 126          158     171

                                          EXHIBITS
                                          ________


                  NAME             JOB_DESCRIPTION             PAGE
                  ____             ___ ___________             ____

                  P-10             C.V. OF DR. FINE             19

                  P-11             REPORT                       31

                  P-12             REPORT                       31

                  P-13             MED. RECORDS OF DR. SOLOMON  40

                  P-15             LETTER                      144
 
                                                                             4




         1

         2                         MORNING_SESSION
                                   _______ _______

         3

         4

         5                     (THE FOLLOWING TRANSPIRED IN OPEN

         6               COURT, OUT OF THE PRESENCE OF THE JURY:)

         7                           THE COURT:  GOOD MORNING,

         8               EVERYONE.  THERE ARE SOME ISSUES?

         9                           MR. FOERSTNER:  YES, YOUR

        10               HONOR.  YESTERDAY, YOUR HONOR -- THERE ARE

        11               TWO ISSUES I'D LIKE TO BRING TO THE COURT'S

        12               ATTENTION.  YESTERDAY AT THE END OF MY DAY

        13               I RESTED WITH WHAT I BELIEVE AT THAT MOMENT

        14               WAS THE END OF MY TESTIMONY WITH DR.

        15               NICHOLS.  HOWEVER, AFTER REVIEWING MY NOTES

        16               I RECOGNIZE THAT I HAD FAILED TO GO OVER A

        17               COUPLE OF ISSUES THAT I WANTED TO ADDRESS

        18               WITH HIM.

        19                           THE COURT:  WHAT ARE THEY?

        20                           MR. FOERSTNER:  THE TWO ISSUES

        21               WERE THAT I DID NOT DISCUSS WITH HIM

        22               SPECIFICALLY THE MEDICAL RECORDS OF THE

        23               PATIENT THAT HAD E.K.C. IN THE E.R.  AND,

        24               SECONDLY, OTHER ISSUE IS, FRANKLY, I DON'T
 
                                                                             5




         1               RECALL WHETHER I SAID THE MAGIC WORD TO HIM

         2               WHETHER OR NOT IT WAS A VIOLATION OF THE

         3               STANDARD OF CARE FOR A PHYSICIAN NOT TO

         4               WASH HIS HANDS AND WHETHER HE HAD AN

         5               OPINION AS TO WHETHER THAT OCCURRED.

         6                           THE COURT:
	 

 


      Copyright 2004 - 2008 CrossExam LLC
      All rights reserved.
dmca