Home

Find Transcripts
Search Transcripts
Browse by Case Name
Browse by Expert Name
Browse by Expert Type
Product Pricing
Legal Topics
FAQ

Demo

REGISTER!

About Us
HELP!
Links
Privacy Policy

 


By clicking the "BUY NOW" button, you agree to our Transcript License Agreement
Cost: $585.00
Case: BRANES N. SOUTHARD AND DEBORAH SOUTHARD vs. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL DAVID H. CLEMENTS, III, M.D., WILLIAM F. YOUNG, M.D.
Testimony Date: March 14, 1997
Expert Witness: CHARLES EDWARDS M.D.
Expert Type: Orthopedic Surgery
Court: State: Pennsylvania County: Philadelphia
Pages: 195
	 






                    IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY

                          FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

                                    CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION

                                           - - -

                  BRANES N. SOUTHARD AND DEBORAH      : OCTOBER TERM, 1994
                  SOUTHARD

                        VS.                           :

                  TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL          :  NO. 1376
                  DAVID H. CLEMENTS, III, M.D.,
                  WILLIAM F. YOUNG, M.D.

                                           - - -

                                 COMPLEX LITIGATION CENTER
                                    WANAMAKER BUILDING
                                 PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA

                                           - - -

                                       MARCH 14, 1997

                                         VOLUME V

                                           - - -

                  BEFORE:  HONORABLE VICTOR J. DI NUBILE, JR.

                                           - - -








                       GEORGE D'ANGELIS, RPR, OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
                                1321 ARCH STREET - SUITE 302
                                  PHILADELPHIA, PA. 19107
                                       (215) 686-4240







                                   GEORGE D'ANGELIS, RPR
 






                  APPEARANCES:



                               LAW FIRM:  SHELLER, LUDWIG & BADEY
                               BY:  JOHN P. KOPESKY, ESQUIRE
                               COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFFS



                               LAW FIRM:  ABRAHAMS, LOEWENSTEIN, BUSHMAN &
                               KAUFFMAN
                               BY:  J. KURT STRAUB, ESQUIRE
                               COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANTS





















                       GEORGE D'ANGELIS, RPR, OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
                                1321 ARCH STREET - SUITE 302
                                  PHILADELPHIA, PA. 19107
                                       (215) 686-4240














                                   GEORGE D'ANGELIS, RPR
 









                                          I N D E X
                                          _ _ _ _ _







                  WITNESSES               DIRECT  CROSS  REDIRECT  RECROSS
                  _________               ______  _____  ________  _______



                  DAVID ANDREWS             11     30



                  CHARLES C. EDWARDS        37     91      163



                  WILLIAM YOUNG            167





























                                   GEORGE D'ANGELIS, RPR
 
                                                                             4




         1

         2                         MORNING_SESSION
                                   _______ _______

         3

         4                     (AT 9:25 A.M. THE FOLLOWING TOOK

         5               PLACE IN OPEN COURT, ALL PARTIES PRESENT:)

         6                           THE COURT:  MR. STRAUB, YOU

         7               WISH TO CALL A WITNESS OUT OF TURN AND THEN

         8               WE WILL CONTINUE WITH DR. YOUNG WHEN WE

         9               FINISH THE OTHER TWO WITNESSES?

        10                           MR. STRAUB:  THANK YOU, SIR.

        11               ACTUALLY, IF I MAY, I'D LIKE TO BEGIN TODAY

        12               QUICKLY BY READING THE REQUEST FOR

        13               ADMISSIONS.

        14                           THE COURT:  VERY WELL.  AGAIN,

        15               I THINK I EXPLAINED THIS TO YOU, LADIES AND

        16               GENTLEMEN OF THE JURY, THAT REQUEST FOR

        17               ADMISSIONS IS THAT ONE SIDE OR ONE PARTY

        18               COULD ASK FOR REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS FROM

        19               THE OTHER SIDE SAYING:  DO YOU AGREE WITH

        20               THESE FACTS.  THE OTHER SIDE WILL EITHER

        21               SAY:  I DO OR I DO NOT.  AND HERE THERE

        22               WERE CERTAIN REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS AND

        23               CERTAIN ADMISSIONS BY THE PLAINTIFF.  IT'S

        24               NOT A HUNDRED PERCENT CLEARCUT, BUT WE HAVE







                                   GEORGE D'ANGELIS, RPR
 
                                                                             5




         1               GONE OVER THIS.

         2                           MR. KOPESKY:  VERY SIMPLY, I

         3               THINK WHAT NEEDS TO BE MADE CLEAR IS THE

         4               FACTS THAT MR. STRAUB WILL BE READING ARE
	 

 


      Copyright 2004 - 2008 CrossExam LLC
      All rights reserved.
dmca