Home

Find Transcripts
Search Transcripts
Browse by Case Name
Browse by Expert Name
Browse by Expert Type
Product Pricing
Legal Topics
FAQ

Demo

REGISTER!

About Us
HELP!
Links
Privacy Policy

 


By clicking the "BUY NOW" button, you agree to our Transcript License Agreement
Cost: $561.00
Case: DAVID MC GOWAN vs. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP.
Testimony Date: February 08, 2000
Expert Witness: LAURENTINE FROMM
Expert Type: Psychiatry
Court: State: Pennsylvania County: Philadelphia
Pages: 187

	 





         1

         2

         3
                                IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
         4
                          FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
         5
                                    CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION
         6
                                         -   -   -
         7
                  DAVID MC GOWAN             : JULY, 1998
         8                                   :
                       VS.                   :
         9                                   :
                  CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP.    :  NO. 519
        10
                                         -   -   -
        11
                                     FEBRUARY 18, 2000
        12
                                         -   -   -
        13
                                  COURTROOM 253, CITY HALL
        14
                                         -   -   -
        15
                  BEFORE:  HONORABLE VICTOR J. DI NUBILE, J.
        16                               AND A JURY

        17

        18

        19

        20

        21

        22

        23

        24
 





         1
                  APPEARANCES:
         2

         3                     SACCHETTA & BALDINO
                               BY:  THOMAS F. SACCHETTA, ESQUIRE
         4                          JOE TUCKER, ESQUIRE
                               FOR THE PLAINTIFF
         5

         6
                               SWARTZ, CAMPBELL & DETWEILER
         7                     BY:  MICHELE E. TURNER, ESQUIRE
                               FOR THE DEFENDANT
         8

         9

        10                     GEORGE D'ANGELIS, R.P.R.
                               OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
        11

        12

        13

        14

        15

        16

        17

        18

        19

        20

        21

        22

        23

        24
 





         1

         2
                                         I_N_D_E_X
                                         _ _ _ _ _
         3

         4        WITNESSES:
                  _________ 
                                    DIRECT   CROSS  REDIRECT  RECROSS
         5
                   LAURENTINE FROMM   8        16      55
         6

         7         ARTHUR STEINHAUER 115       63      96       102
                                              118
         8
                   JOHN O'BRIEN      127      133     182       184
         9                           141      174

        10

        11

        12

        13

        14

        15

        16

        17

        18

        19

        20

        21

        22

        23

        24
 
                                                                             4




         1

         2                          MORNING_SESSION
                                    _______ _______

         3

         4

         5                     (AT 9:30 A.M. THE FOLLOWING TOOK PLACE

         6               IN OPEN COURT, JURY NOT PRESENT:)

         7                           THE COURT:  WE ARE STILL WAITING

         8               FOR SOME OF THE JURORS.  DUE TO THIS

         9               INCLEMENT WEATHER I KNOW THEY ARE HAVING A

        10               HARD TIME GETTING IN.  NOW, I MADE SOME

        11               RULINGS AS TO MR. STEINHAUER'S DEPOSITION.

        12               I NEED NOT REITERATE THAT.  I THINK I MADE

        13               MYSELF CLEAR ON THAT.

        14                           MS. TURNER:  I HAVE ONE ISSUE

        15               WITH RESPECT TO THAT.  I SUSPECT THAT

        16               COUNSEL'S BACK DOOR IS GOING TO TRY TO GET

        17               IN THE FACT THAT THE TRAFFIC ACCESS GATE IN

        18               QUESTION HAS A SIGN ON IT.  TO THE EXTENT

        19               THAT I FEEL IT MOVED INTO SUBSEQUENT

        20               REMEDIAL REPAIR ASPECT TO THAT APPROPRIATE

        21               RULE OF EVIDENCE.

        22                           THE COURT:  I GUESS THERE ARE A

        23               COUPLE OF EXCEPTIONS.

        24                           MS. TURNER:  NO DISPUTE AS TO
 
                                                                             5




         1               OWNERSHIP OF THAT GATE.

         2                           MR. TUCKER:  IT'S NOT AN

         3               OWNERSHIP ISSUE.

         4                           THE COURT:  YOU ARE SAYING IT'S

         5               NOTICE?  THIS HAPPENED HOW MANY YEARS AGO?

         6                           MS. TURNER:  EIGHT YEARS AGO.

         7                           THE COURT:  IF THIS HAD JUST

         8               HAPPENED.  THE FACT THAT THERE IS
	 

 


      Copyright 2004 - 2008 CrossExam LLC
      All rights reserved.
dmca