![]()
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
2 LAKE COUNTY, OHIO
3 MARY PECENAK, et al.,
4 Plaintiffs,
JUDGE PARKS
5 -vs- CASE NO. 92 CV 001587
6 LORI REILLY, et al.,
7 Defendants.
8
9 Videotape deposition of DONALD C. MANN, M.D.,
10 taken as if upon direct examination before Dawn
11 M. Fade, a Registered Professional Reporter and
12 Notary Public within and for the State of Ohio,
13 at the oftices of Donald C. Mann, M.D., 1611
14 South Green Road, Cleveland, Ohio, at 3:40 p.m.
15 on Thursday, May 27, 1993, pursuant to notice
16 and/or stipulations of counsel, on-behalf of the
17 Defendants in this cause.'
18 - - - -
19
MEHLER & HAGESTROM
20 Court Reporters
1750 Midland Building
21 Cleveland, Ohio 44115
216.621.4984
22 FAX 621.0050
800.822.0650
2 3
2 4
2 5
2
1 APPEARANCES:
2 Mark D. Amaddio, Esq.
Reminger & Reminger
3 7th Floor 113 St. Clair Building
Cleveland, Ohio 44114
4 (216) 687-1311,
5 On behalf of the Plaintiffs;
6 Kathryn M. Murray, Esq.
Weston, Hurd, Fallon, Paisley & Howley
7 2500 Terminal Tower
Cleveland, Ohio 44113
8 (216) 241-6602,
9 On behalf of the Defendants.
10 ALSO PRESENT:
11 Randy Andrews, Video Technician
12 - - - -
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2 0
21
2 2
2 3
2 4
25
3
1 MR. AMADDIO: We're here in Dr.
2 Mann's office at about 3:40 on May 27th. I
3 have a letter from defense counsel
4 indicating that they're admitting
5 negligence on behalf of Lori Reilly; and
6 she has also given me a dismissal entry,
7 which I intend to sign and file concerning
8 Michael Reilly. My only concern is by
9 dismissing Mr. Reilly that that doesn't
10 affect any insurance coverage in the case;
11 and my understanding from defense counsel
12 is that she spoke with her adjuster and
13 there wouldn't be a coverage issue involved
14 if we dismiss Mr. Reilly. Is that
15 correct?
16 MS. MURRAY: That's correct.
17 MR. AMADDIO: The only other
is comment that I want to make on the record
19 is with regard to the depo notice for Dr.
20 Mann's depo. I have premarked, and I will
21 ask the court reporter to take into her
22 possession, the depo notice for today,
23 which notices it for today at 3:30, and it
24 says that, taken pursuant to Rule 30 of the
25 Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure, and inasmuch
4
1 as the witness is a party to the
2 litigation, no subpoena was served. And my
3 understanding is, first of all, that Dr.
4 Mann is not a witness in this case. Is
5 that correct?
6 MS. MURRAY: Yes. Well, he is an
7 expert witness for the defense, yes.
8 MR. AMADDIO: Okay. Is he a party
9 to the litigation?
10 MS. MURRAY: No, he is not a party
11 to the litigation.
12 MR. AMADDIO: So that is incorrect
13 in the depo notice?
14 MS. MURRAY: Yes, I would say that
15 the depo notice was in error.
16 MR. AMADDIO: Okay.
17 MS. MURRAY: I can file a new one
18 with the court.
19 MR. AMADDIO: That's okay. My
20 objection at this point is I'm not prepared
21
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright 2004 - 2008 CrossExam LLC All rights reserved.dmca | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||