Home

Find Transcripts
Search Transcripts
Browse by Case Name
Browse by Expert Name
Browse by Expert Type
Product Pricing
Legal Topics
FAQ

Demo

REGISTER!

About Us
HELP!
Links
Privacy Policy

 


Get a FREE copy of this Transcript!
By clicking the "BUY NOW" button, you agree to our Transcript License Agreement
Cost: $150.00
Case: RICHARD DALZIEL V. KAISER PERMANENTE
Testimony Date: September 28, 1994
Expert Witness: JEFFREY R. RUBIN M.D.
Expert Type: Cardiovascular Surgery
Court: State: Ohio County: Cuyahoga
Pages: 60

	 1-7 CO Z-



1 State of Ohio, SS:

2 County of Cuyahoga

3 - - -

4 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

5 - - -

6 Richard Dalziel, etc,

7 Plaintiff, Case No 256240

8 VS

9 Kaiser Foundation Health
Plan of Ohio, et al,
10
Defendants
11

12

13 THE DEPOSITION OF JEFFREY R RUBIN, MD

14 WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 1994

15 - - -

16 The deposition of JEFFREY R RUBIN, MD, a witness,

17 called for examination by the Plaintiff, under the Ohio

18 Rules of Civil Procedure, taken before me, Michelle R

19 Hordinski, Registered Professional Reporter and Notary

20 Public in and for the State of Ohio, pursuant to

21 agreement, at the offices of Jeffrey R Rubin, MD, 500

22 Gypsy Lane, Youngstown, Ohio, commencing at 11:00 am,

23 the day and date above set forth

24

25 - - -

2





1 APPEARANCES:

2

3 On behalf of the Plaintiff:

4 RICHARD BERRIS, ESQ
Weisman, Goldberg & Weisman
5 1600 Midland Building
Cleveland, Ohio 44113
6

7
on behalf of the Defendants:
8
GARY GOLDWASSER, ESQ
9 Reminger & Reminger
The 113 St Clair Building
10 Cleveland, Ohio 44113

11

12

13

14

15

16 - - -

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

1 JEFFREY R RUBIN, MD
2 a witness, called for examination by the Plaintiff, under
3 the Rules, having been first duly sworn, as hereinafter
4 certified, deposed and said as follows:
5 CROSS-EXAMINATION
6 BY MR  BERRIS:
7 Q State your full name
8 A Jeffrey Reed Rubin
9 Q Is there a CV available?  I know I had one
10 MR GOLDWASSER: Oh, I have --
11 MR BERRIS: You know what,
12 it was attached to the report
13 MR GOLDWASSER: Yes
14 Well, Eric has used Dr Rubin as a
15 witness before, so I'm sure he has material
16 on him
17 Q Did you testify for Eric Kennedy in a case?
18 A I've reviewed records for him I haven't testified
19 for him
20 MR GOLDWASSER: He did testify
21 in deposition once
22 MR BERRIS: For Eric?
23 MR GOLDWASSER: For Eric in a
24 case I defended
25 MR BERRIS: Which case?
4



1 MR GOLDWASSER: That was a
2 double amputee case of a lady, Fern
3 Hayes
4 BY MR  BERRIS:
5 Q I was provided with a copy of your CV
6 Is this your full CV?
7 A No It's probably the face sheet
8 Q This is just the face sheet of your CV?
9 A Probably an old one
10 Q Is there a new full CV available?
11 A Yes
12 Q We can get that before we leave?
13 A Yes
14 Q What records did you review prior to preparing your
15 report?
16 A These records (Indicating)
17 Q You've handed me some papers that are clipped
18 together, which includes Mr Goldwasser's cover
19 letter and the document that you reviewed?
20 A Correct
21 Q You did not review the full medical record?
22 A This is all I reviewed
23 MR GOLDWASSER: And the x-ray
24 films he saw
25 THE WITNESS: Yes
5



1 BY MR  BERRIS:
2 Q And the films, are you talking about the
3 ultrasound?
4 A And the angiograms
5 MR GOLDWASSER: I sent him all
6 the records from November 9, 1992 up through
7 the time of his death I didn't send him
8 all the St Luke's records
9 Q How many times, approximately, have you testified,
10 given a deposition in a medical legal matter?
11 A I've probably given somewhere between five and ten
12 over the past ten years
13 Q How many times has Mr Goldwasser asked you to
14 review a case?
15 A I believe once before I can't remember exactly
16 MR GOLDWASSER: We just tried
17 to figure that out I thought you would ask
18 that question Neither of us could
19 remember
20 I know he's reviewed one or two cases
21 when he was at UH for me  He has testified
22 against my client more than he has in
23 favor
24 Q The three of us have been together on one occasion
25 under similar circumstances Is that the one you
6



1 remembered, the Herman Mark case?
2 MR GOLDWASSER: Oh, that's
3 right I forgot about the Herman Mark
4 case
5 A Is that the Cleveland Clinic?
6 Q Yes
7 A That's the case I remember
8 Q The fellow that lost his leg?
9 A Yes
10 Q What's your definition of an impending rupture of
11 an abdominal aortic aneurysm?
12 A An impending rupture is an aneurysm that has gotten
13 to the point where, if you don't do something
14 quickly, it's going to rupture imminently
15 Q When you say imminently, what does that mean?
16 A Within the next few hours
17 Q What's an expanding triple A?
18 A Any aneurysm that is growing
19 Q Is every aneurysm, abdominal aortic aneurysm, an
20 expanding triple A?
21 A No
22 Q What is the difference between -- when you say it's
23 growing, does it grow consistently? Is it
24 variable?
25 A Well, the average growth of aortic aneurysms, based
7



1 on national history studies, is about four
2 millimeters per year That does not mean that
3 every aneurysm grows
	 

 


      Copyright 2004 - 2008 CrossExam LLC
      All rights reserved.
dmca