1 State of Ohio,
SS:
2 County of Cuyahoga.

3 - - -

4 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

5

6 Sharon A. Walden, et al.,

7 Plaintiffs,
Case No. 277480
8 VS.
Judge Gaughan
9 Family Dental Centers, et al.,

10 Defendants.

11
CONTINUED DEPOSITION OF
12 KENNETH CALLAHAN, D.D.S.
TUESDAY, AUGUST 13, 1996
13

14 The continued deposition of Kenneth Callahan,

15 D.D.S., a witness herein, called by the Plaintiffs

16 for examination under the Ohio Rules of Civil

17 Procedure, taken before me, Ivy J. Gantverg,

18 Registered Professional Reporter and Notary Public

19 in and for the State of Ohio, by agreement of

20 counsel and without further notice or other legal

21 formalities, at Southgate Medical Arts Building,

22 21100 Southgate Park Boulevard, Maple Heights, Ohio,

23 commencing at 9:35 a.m., on the day and date above

24 set forth.

2S

- - - - F F

I APPEARANCES:

2 On behalf of the Plaintiffs:

3 Fred Weisman, Esq.
Weisman, Goldberg & Weisman
4 1600 Midland Building
Cleveland, Ohio 44115
5
on behalf of Defendants Mark Florman, D.D.S.
6 and Michael Florman, D.D.S.:

7 Richard J. Rymond, Esq.
Reminger & Reminger
8 113 St. Clair Building
Cleveland, Ohio 44114
9
On behalf of Defendant Family Dental Centers:
10
(No Appearance)
11

12

13

14

15

16

17

is

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

1 KENNETH CALLAHAN, D.D.S.
2 a witness herein, called by the plaintiffs for
3 examination under the Rules, having been first duly
4 sworn, as hereinafter certified, was deposed and
5 said as follows:
6 CONTINUED CROSS EXAMINATION
7 BY MR. WEISMAN:
8 Q. Dr. Callahan, this is just supplemental to
9 the original deposition that was taken of you on
10 January 29, 1996.
11 I don't intend that we are going to be a long
12 time in this, or a whole lot of questions, but I do
13 have a few things I want to ask you about.
14 I also endeavor not to be repetitious as to
15 any of those questions put to you before. I will
16 try to do that.
17 Have you reviewed any additional items,
18 reports, or things relating to Mrs. Walden --
19 A. I have.
20 Q. -- since the deposition that was taken of you
21 back in January of 1996, sir?
22 A. Yes.
23 Q. What were those reports or things that you
24 reviewed after your deposition?
25 A. I read the deposition of Dr. Neary, and this
I morning, a neurology report from a Fairview Park
2 neurologist.
3 Q. That would be whose