![]()
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
1
1
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
2
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
3
CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION
4
- - -
5
JOSEPH CAMM AND MARY CAMM : MAY TERM, 2000
6 :
:
7 VS. :
:
8 :
ALFRED P. MARCHETTI, D.O., : NO. 3983
9 ET AL. :
10 - - -
11 FEBRUARY 3, 2003
COURTROOM 253, CITY HALL
12 PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA
13 - - -
14 VOLUME II
15 - - -
16
BEFORE: HONORABLE VICTOR J. DI NUBILE, J.
17 AND A JURY
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2
1
2
3
APPEARANCES:
4
5
LAYSER & FREIWALD
6 BY: AARON FREIWALD, ESQUIRE
PATRICIA GIORDANO, ESQUIRE
7 COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFF
8
9
STAHL AND DE LAURENTIS, P.C.
10 BY: JAMES F. GALLO, ESQUIRE
COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANT,
11 DR. ALFRED MARCHETTI
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
GEORGE D'ANGELIS, R.P.R.
21 OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
22
23
24
25
3
1
2
3 I_N_D_E_X
_ _ _ _ _
4
WITNESSES:
_________
5
DIRECT CROSS REDIRECT RECROSS
6
JOSEPH CAMM 77 125 172 180
7
TODD BROAD, M.D. 182 191
8 196
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
4
1 THE COURT: YOU CAN ALL SIT DOWN.
2 SOMEONE, I THINK AN ATTORNEY, CALLED MY
3 OFFICE AND SPOKE TO MY LAW CLERK. I GUESS
4 IT WAS MR. LYNCH, I PRESUME. AND THEY ARE
5 ASSERTING A LIEN ON THE -- I GUESS IN THIS
6 CASE. BUT I BELIEVE UNDER THE MCARE ACT,
7 EVEN ASSUMING FOR THE SAKE OF ARGUMENT, AND
8 I KNOW YOU CONTEST THE FACT THAT ANY
9 ADDITIONAL INJURIES ARE RELATED TO WORK.
10 YOU ARE SAYING THAT HE WOULD HAVE STILL
11 LOST THE WORK DESPITE ANY NEGLIGENCE ON THE
12 PART OF DR. MARCHETTI. NOT WITHSTANDING
13 THAT FACT, I THINK THE MCARE ACT PRETTY
14 MUCH, THE WAY I VIEW IT, PRECLUDES THE
15 ASSERTION OF THE LIEN BECAUSE YOU ARE
16 PRECLUDED FROM RECOVERING FOR LOST WAGES
17 AND MEDICALS THAT HAVE BEEN COVERED,
18 REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THEY ARE SUBJECT TO A
19 LIEN OR NOT IT APPEARS.
20 MR. FREIWALD: YOUR HONOR, A
21 COUPLE OF POINTS. NUMBER ONE, I DID SPEAK
22
| |||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright 2004 - 2008 CrossExam LLC All rights reserved.dmca | ||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||