1-(202) 684-6756

Expert Witness : Neil Crane MD


Case Carroll v. Hahnemann Univ. Hospital, et al
Testimony Date March 05, 1995
Expert Type Infectious Diseases
Court State: Pennsylvania County: philadelphia
Pages 58
Cost $174.00

OR

Trade us a transcript with expert testimony for this transcript

Click Here For Details

                                                                    63




         1

         2

         3

         4               (WHEREUPON THE TIME IS 11:35 A.M.)

         5                             - - -

         6    BY MR. EISENBERG:

         7    Q.     DR. CRANE, I BELIEVE WE WERE TALKING ABOUT THE

         8    OUTPATIENT TREATMENT THAT MR. CARROLL RECEIVED AFTER HE

         9    WAS DISCHARGED ON 4/5 1988.  DO YOU HAVE THAT RECORD IN

        10    FRONT OF YOU?

        11    A.     I HAVE MY NOTES IN FRONT OF ME.  I DON'T HAVE THE

        12    ACTUAL RECORD.

        13    Q.     I THINK WE MARKED THOSE RECORDS.  COUNSEL WAS

        14    LOOKING AT THEM.  I WILL SHOW YOU THE ACTUAL RECORDS.

        15           ON APRIL 12TH OF 1988, HE WAS TOLD TO COME BACK

        16    TO SEE WHOM?

        17    A.     DR. DI SIMEONE.

        18    Q.     WHEN WAS HE TOLD TO COME BACK TO SEE DR.

        19    DI SIMEONE?

        20    A.     IN TWO WEEKS.  APPROXIMATELY TWO WEEKS IT SAYS.

        21    Q.     WHEN DID HE COME BACK?

        22    A.     APRIL 22ND.

        23    Q.     THAT'S LESS THAN TWO WEEKS, RIGHT?

        24    A.     YES.
 

                                                                    64




         1    Q.     HE SAW DR. DI SIMEONE --

         2                       MR. LAYSER:  OBJECTION.  THE RECORD

         3           DOES NOT STATE THAT HE SAW DR. DI SIMEONE.

         4                       THE COURT:  WHEN?  ON APRIL 22ND IT

         5           DOES NOT?

         6                       MR. LAYSER:  DOES NOT.

         7                       THE COURT:  WHAT DOES THE RECORD

         8           REFLECT.

         9                       MR. EISENBERG:  IF HE DIDN'T SEE DR.

        10           DI SIMEONE, I WILL --

        11                       MR. LAYSER:  THERE'S NOTHING IN THERE

        12           TO INDICATE THAT HE SAW DR. DI SIMEONE, NOR IS

        13           DR. DI SIMEONE'S SIGNATURE ON THAT RECORD.

        14                       THE COURT:  SO YOU ARE SAYING THE TWO

        15           OUT-PATIENT VISITS ON 4/12 AND 4/22 -- THERE WERE

        16           TWO OUT-PATIENT VISITS, BUT THE RECORD REFLECTS

        17           HE DID NOT SEE DR. DI SIMEONE?

        18                       MR. LAYSER:  MY INTERPRETATION OF

        19           THOSE COMPENSATION C