Home

Find Transcripts
Search Transcripts
Browse by Case Name
Browse by Expert Name
Browse by Expert Type
Product Pricing
Legal Topics
FAQ

Demo

REGISTER!

About Us
HELP!
Links
Privacy Policy

 


By clicking the "BUY NOW" button, you agree to our Transcript License Agreement
Cost: $249.00
Case: TAMEKA CALEB V. STRICK CORPORATION AND CRST, INC. AND LAWRENCE CHRISTIAN
Testimony Date: November 17, 2000
Expert Witness: DAVID POPE
Expert Type: Metallurgy
Court: State: Pennsylvania County: Philadelphia
Pages: 83

	 
                                                                             1




         1
                                IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
         2
                          FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
         3
                                    CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION
         4
                                          -  -  -
         5
                  TAMEKA CALEB, AN INCAPACITATED : AUG TERM, 1998
         6        PERSON BY BRENDA CALEB

         7                 V

         8        STRICK CORPORATION
                       AND
         9        CRST, INC
                       AND
        10        LAWRENCE CHRISTIAN            :  NO 4365

        11                                -  -  -

        12                           NOVEMBER 17, 2000

        13                                VOLUME V
                                          -  -  -
        14
                                  COURTROOM 253, CITY HALL
        15                       PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA

        16                                -  -  -

        17        BEFORE:  HONORABLE VICTOR J DI NUBILE, J
                                         AND A JURY
        18

        19

        20

        21

        22

        23                     GEORGE D'ANGELIS, RPR
                               OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
        24
 
                                                                             2




         1

         2
                  APPEARANCES:
         3

         4                     ANAPOL, SCHWARTZ, WEISS, COHAN
                               FELDMAN AND SMALLEY, PC
         5                     BY:  SOL H WEISS, ESQUIRE
                               MICHELLE ALTENPOHL, ESQUIRE
         6                     COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFFS

         7
                               RAWLE & HENDERSON, LLP
         8                     BY:  THOMAS KUZMICK, ESQUIRE,
                               COUNSEL FOR STRICK CORP
         9

        10                     BY:  THOMAS J WAGNER, ESQUIRE
                               COUNSEL FOR CRST, INC AND LAWRENCE
        11                     CHRISTIAN

        12

        13

        14

        15

        16

        17

        18

        19

        20

        21

        22

        23

        24
 
                                                                             3




         1

         2                               I_N_D_E_X
                                         _ _ _ _ _

         3        WITNESSES:
                  _________ 
                                     DIRECT    CROSS
         4
                  DAVID POPE          42        62
         5                                      89

         6

         7

         8

         9

        10

        11

        12

        13

        14

        15

        16

        17

        18

        19

        20

        21

        22

        23

        24
 
                                                                             4




         1

         2                         MORNING_SESSION
                                   _______ _______

         3

         4

         5                     (THE FOLLOWING TRANSPIRED IN OPEN

         6               COURT, OUT OF THE PRESENCE OF THE JURY:)

         7                           MR KUZMICK:  I HAVE TWO BRIEF

         8               MOTIONS, IF I MAY, YOUR HONOR

         9                           THE COURT:  I SUGGEST TO

        10               COUNSEL THAT WE GET ON WITH THIS BECAUSE

        11               THE JURY IS CONCERNED

        12                           MR KUZMICK:  THIS IMPACTS

        13               ON THE REST OF THE TRIAL  FIRST OF ALL,

        14               YESTERDAY I MOVED FOR SANCTIONS AS A RESULT

        15               OF CRST'S INTENTIONAL FAILURE TO

        16               PRODUCE NOT ONLY THE BUMPER, BUT ALSO

        17               PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN BY AN EXPERT,

        18               MEASUREMENTS TAKEN BY AN EXPERT  YOUR

        19               HONOR, I AGAIN MOVE NOT ONLY FOR SANCTIONS,

        20               BUT THE SANCTIONS SHOULD BE A DIRECTED

        21               VERDICT ON MY CROSS CLAIM AGAINST CRST

        22                           THE COURT:  THAT'S DENIED

        23               NEXT ISSUE

        24                           MR KUZMICK:  THE NEXT ISSUE IS
 
                                                                             5




         1               THAT I HAVE NOW BEEN ADVISED BY MR WEISS

         2               THAT HE HAS FILED A WRIT OF SUMMONS AGAINST

         3               CRST  I'VE MOVED TO HAVE THAT
	 

 


      Copyright 2004 - 2008 CrossExam LLC
      All rights reserved.
dmca