Home

Find Transcripts
Search Transcripts
Browse by Case Name
Browse by Expert Name
Browse by Expert Type
Product Pricing
Legal Topics
FAQ

Demo

REGISTER!

About Us
HELP!
Links
Privacy Policy

 


By clicking the "BUY NOW" button, you agree to our Transcript License Agreement
Cost: $291.00
Case: LUCE V. DR. MARK ULITSKY AND NAZARETH HOSPITAL ET AL
Testimony Date: February 08, 2002
Expert Witness: JUDD HOLLANDER M.D.
Expert Type: Emergency Medicine / Trauma
Court: State: Pennsylvania County: Philadelphia
Pages: 97

	 
                                                                             1




         1
                                IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
         2
                          FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
         3
                                    CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION
         4
                                         -   -   -
         5
                  JOSEPH LUCE AND MARY LUCE, : MAY TERM, 1999
         6        HUSBAND/WIFE               :
                                             :
         7               VS                 :
                                             :
         8        DR MARK ULITSKY AND       :
                  NAZARETH HOSPITAL, ET AL  : NO 1803
         9

        10                               -   -   -

        11                            FEBRUARY 8, 2002
                                  COURTROOM 253, CITY HALL
        12                       PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA

        13                               -   -   -

        14        BEFORE:  HONORABLE VICTOR J DI NUBILE, J
                                         AND A JURY
        15

        16

        17

        18

        19

        20

        21

        22

        23

        24
 
                                                                             2




         1

         2

         3
                  APPEARANCES:
         4

         5
                               OXMAN, GOODSTADT, KREVITZ & KURITZ
         6                     BY:  DAVID KURITZ, ESQUIRE
                               COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFF
         7

         8
                               POST & SCHELL, PC
         9                     BY:  SHARON REISS, ESQUIRE
                               COUNSEL FOR DR MARK ULITSKY
        10

        11
                               WHITE & WILLIAMS, PC
        12                     BY:  SUZANNE PRITCHARD, ESQUIRE
                               COUNSEL FOR NAZARETH HOSPITAL
        13

        14

        15

        16

        17

        18

        19

        20

        21

        22                     GEORGE D'ANGELIS, RPR
                               OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
        23                     COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

        24
 
                                                                             3




         1

         2                               I_N_D_E_X
                                         _ _ _ _ _

         3
                  WITNESSES:
                  _________ 
         4
                                       DIRECT  CROSS   REDIRECT  RECROSS
         5
                  DR MARK ULITSKY       9      36        41
         6
                  DR JUDD HOLLANDER    44      54        94       95
         7                              57      78

         8

         9

        10

        11

        12

        13

        14

        15

        16

        17

        18

        19

        20

        21

        22

        23

        24
 
                                                                             4




         1

         2                         MORNING_SESSION
                                   _______ _______

         3

         4

         5                     (THE FOLLOWING TRANSPIRED IN OPEN

         6               COURT, OUT OF THE PRESENCE OF THE JURY:)

         7                           MS PRITCHARD:  YOUR HONOR, IN

         8               LIGHT OF OBJECTION THAT WAS MADE AT THE

         9               BEGINNING OF THE TRIAL CONCERNING THE STAFF

        10               PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING FICO INSURANCE

        11               COMPANY, I WOULD LIKE TO PLACE ON THE

        12               RECORD A COPY OF AN ORDER THAT I RECEIVED

        13               LATE IN THE DAY YESTERDAY THAT HAS BEEN

        14               APPARENTLY ENTERED BY JUDGE HERON IN LIGHT

        15               OF THE LIQUIDATION ORDER DATED FEBRUARY 1ST

        16               THAT THE CASE IS PENDING AGAINST AN INSURED

        17               OF FICO INSURANCE COMPANY SHALL BE

        18               PLACED IN DEFERRED STATUS ACCORDING TO THIS

        19               ORDER IS DATED FEBRUARY 6, 2002

        20                           THE COURT:  WE ARE ON TRIAL

        21               IT SAYS ALL ACTIONS CURRENTLY PENDING

        22               AGAINST AN INSURED, AGAINST AN INSURED OF

        23               FICO  THE FICO INSURED IS DR SAUL

        24               THIS CASE IS NOT AGAINST DR SAUL  I THINK
 
                                                                             5




         1               WE'VE ALREADY COVERED THIS  I DON'T WANT

         
	 

 


      Copyright 2004 - 2008 CrossExam LLC
      All rights reserved.
dmca