1
IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF THE STATE OF OHIO
JOSEPH D. MURPHY,
Plaintiff,
vs. Case No.
DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION 99-12073
AND CORRECTIONS OF THE
STATE OF OHIO,
Defendant.
- - - - -
Videotaped deposition of Michael Hauser,
M.D., called for examination under the statute,
taken before me, Jill A. Kulewsky, a Notary
Public in and for the State of Ohio, pursuant to
notice and stipulations of counsel, at 23250
Chagrin Boulevard, Building 4, Beachwood, Ohio,
on Tuesday, January 9, 2001, at 1:00 p.m.
- - - - -
2
APPEARANCES:
On behalf of the Plaintiff:
Law Offices of John F. Heath, by:
JOHN F. HEATH, ESQ.
599 Cheshire Road
Sunbury, Ohio 43073
(740) 965-9697
On behalf of the Defendant:
State of Ohio Attorney General, by:
MONIQUE B. LAMPKE, ESQ.
WILLIAM BECKER, ESQ.
KARHLTON MOORE, ESQ.
Capitol Square Office Building
65 East State Street, Suite 1630
Columbus, Ohio 43215
(614) 466-7447
ALSO PRESENT:
Kurt Henschel, Videographer
3
1 .
2 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Today is January
3 9, 2001, we are going on the record at 1:19.
4 Would the notary please swear in the witness.
5 - - - - -
6 (Thereupon, Defendant's Deposition
| Michael Hauser MD Transcripts |
Peter Bambakidis MD expert witness transcript Sharon A. Walden v. ... .... the Meridia Center tor Rehabilitation 15 and Pain Management, letters written by Dr. Neary 16 pertaining to the patient, a letter from a Michael 17 Hauser to Dr ....
|
JAMES E. BERTZ DDS, MD expert witness transcript JUDITH A. ... .... 14 A. Yes, sir. 15 Q. Do you by any chance know Michael 16 Hauser, Dr. Michael Hauser? 17 A. No, sir. 18 Q. The chief at Mt. Sinai Hospital in 19 Cleveland? ....
|
KENNETH CALLAHAN DDS expert witness transcript Sharon A. Walden v. ... .... 20 Next is a letter from Michael Hauser, ^DMD, 21 MD, November ^24th, 1993 to Dr. John N^eary, 22 recommending re-examination of Sharon Walden, and 23 ....
|
JAMES M. FALKO MD expert witness transcript JUDITH A. SARNOVSKY v. ... .... 16 LET THE RECORD SHOW THAT THIS IS A 17 DEPOSITION OF JAMES MICHAEL FALKO, MD, TAKEN FOR is PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY UNDER RULE 26 B 4 B, AND IS 19 BEING .... HAUSER? ....
|
|
|
|