![]()
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF MEDINA COUNTY, OHIO
PAUL KASZIAN, et al,
Plaintiffs, Case Number
v 01-CIV-0807
KUNAL MITRA, MD,
Defendant
Deposition of NATHAN LEVITAN, MD,
called for examination under the statute, taken
before me, Jaci R Traver, RPR, CRR, and Notary
Public in and for the State of Ohio, at the
offices of Hermann, Cahn & Schneider, 500
Erieview Tower, 1301 East Ninth Street,
Cleveland, Ohio, on Tuesday, the 27th day of
August 2002 at 6:15 pm
-----
2
APPEARANCES:
On behalf of the Plaintiffs:
Hermann, Cahn & Schneider, by
KERRY S VOLSKY, ESQ
500 Erieview Tower
1301 East Ninth Street
Cleveland, Ohio 44114
(216) 781-5515
On behalf of the Defendant:
Sutter, O'Connell, Mannion &
Farchione, by
JOSEPH A FARCHIONE, JR, ESQ
3600 Erieview Tower
1301 East Ninth Street
Cleveland, Ohio 44114
(216) 928-2200
- - - - -
3
1 NATHAN LEVITAN, MD, of lawful
2 age, called for examination, as provided by the
3 statute, being first duly sworn, as hereinafter
4 certified, said as follows:
5 EXAMINATION OF NATHAN LEVITAN, MD
6 BY MR VOLSKY:
7 Q Would you state your name for the
8 record, please
9 A Dr Nathan Levitan
10 Q What is your business address?
11 A University Hospitals of Cleveland,
12 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, 44106
13 Q Doctor, what are your specific
14 areas of expertise?
15 A I'm Board-certified in medical
16 oncology, hematology and internal medicine
17 Q Doctor, what were you asked to do
18 in this case originally?
19 A Well, I can tell you when I review
20 any case, I'm given the records and I'm asked
21 to review them and render an impartial opinion
22 regarding the case before I really have a sense
23 of what any attorney's agenda is I do that
24 because if I don't feel comfortable with the
25 case, I wouldn't get involved in it
4
1 As far as my specific involvement
2 in this case, I've been asked to render
3 opinions principally regarding proximate cause,
4 and in particular, the staging and prognosis of
5 this tumor at different points in time
6 Q Have you ever reviewed cases for
7 Mr Farchione before this case?
8 A I don't think so No
9 Q What about since this case, have
10 you reviewed any other case before?
11 A I don't think so
12 Q Mr Farchione was with the law firm
13 of Reminger & Reminger Have you reviewed
14 cases for that firm?
15 A Yes
16 Q Tell me who at that firm you've
17 reviewed cases for and the number of cases for
18 that firm
19 A Well, I don't keep -- I don't keep
20 strict track of such things I can tell you
21 that I probably reviewed eight to ten or so
22 cases a year in the last few years; somewhat
23 less before that That is to say, one a month
24 or a little bit less than that
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright 2004 - 2010 CrossExam LLC All rights reserved.dmca | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||