1


                           IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

                             OF SUMMIT COUNTY, OHIO



                 JULIE ADAMS-CLARKE,

                             Plaintiff,

                       vs.                       Case No.

                 PATRICK CLARKE,                 CV 2001-08-4162

                             Defendant.



                                     ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

                             Videotaped deposition of JEFFREY S.

                 MORRIS, M.D., called for examination under the

                 statute, taken before me, Kelly A. Holden, a

                 Notary Public in and for the State of Ohio, by

                 agreement of counsel, at the offices of Jeffrey

                 S. Morris, M.D., The Falls Group Building, 3033

                 State Road, Suite 104, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, on

                 Thursday, July 25th, 2002 at 4:30 p.m.

                                     ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

                                                                  2


                 APPEARANCES:



                       On behalf of the Plaintiff:

                             McCarthy, Lebit, Crystal &

                             Liffman Co., L.P.A. by

                             DAVID A. SCHAEFER, ESQ.

                             1800 Midland Building

                             101 West Prospect Avenue

                             Cleveland, Ohio  44115

                             (216) 696-6422



                       On behalf of the Defendant:

                             Kesner, Kesner & Bramble, by

                             MARK A. BRAMBLE, ESQ.

                             112 Capitol Street

                             Charleston, West Virginia  25301

                             (304) 345-5200

                                     ~ ~ ~ ~ ~



                 ALSO PRESENT:

                             Kimberly DiMuzio, videographer

                                  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

                                         3


            1                     -  -  -  -  -

            2                (Thereupon, Defendant's Deposition

            3                Exhibits A and B were marked for

            4                purposes of identification.)

            5                      -  -  -