1
              IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
                 OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO
     
     
     ARTHUR MONCRIEF,
                Plaintiff,
          vs.                               Case No.
     FORD MOTOR COMPANY,                    477932
     et al.,
                Defendants.
     
     
                        ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
                 Videotape deposition of ALVIN J.
     SCHONFELD, D.O., called for examination under
     the statute, taken before me, Denise M.
     Munguia, a Registered Merit Reporter and Notary
     Public in and for the State of Ohio, pursuant
     to notice and stipulations of counsel, at the
     offices of Kelley & Ferraro, LLP, 1901 Penton
     Media Building, 1300 East Ninth Street,
     Cleveland, Ohio, on Monday, October 13, 2003,
     at 4:50 o'clock p.m.
     
                        ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

                                                                     2
 1   APPEARANCES:
 2   
 3        On behalf of the Plaintiff:
 4              Kelley & Ferraro, LLP, by
 5               COREY W. FROST, ESQ.
 6               SHAWN M. ACTON, ESQ.
 7              1901 Penton Media Building
 8              1300 East Ninth Street
 9              Cleveland, Ohio  44114
10              (216) 575-0777
11   
12        On behalf of the Defendant Ford Motor
13        Company:
14              Rademaker, Matty, McClelland &
15              Greve, by
16              CHARLES W. KINKOPF, ESQ.
17              55 Public Square, Suite 1775
18              Cleveland, Ohio  44113
19              (216) 621-1127
20                         ----
21   
22   ALSO PRESENT:
23              Steve Soltz, CLVS
24                         ----
25   

                                                                     3
 1               MR. FROST:  Counsel, it's my
 2   understanding that you are willing to stipulate
 3   on behalf of your client that the credentials
 4   section of Dr. Schonfeld's testimony that was
 5   previously recorded in the matter of Leon
 6   Bennett versus Ford Motor Company will be used
 7   also in this matter, Arthur Moncrief versus
 8   Ford Motor Company, rather than duplicating the
 9   same section of the tape on the record.  And I
10   also understand that during the deposition of
11   Dr. Schonfeld in the matter of Bennett versus
12   Ford that there's also a segment in which yo